With news of the new spending bill, my day is going a lot better than Foyle’s.Continue reading
Nice overhead shot of Foyle/Michael Kitchen seated with an open leg cross, a departure from his customary leg cross:
How should men cross their legs? The J Norman Post lifestyle guide answered the question — back when the POTUS was a man of respect and a model of propriety befitting the office he was holding.Continue reading
Martin maniacally seizes upon the goals of the National Front to a degree that’s too extreme even for Tom Bates.
How far are today’s resurgent right wing and its supporters willing to go?Continue reading
I wonder what the winning caption for this photo was:
@RadioTimes Oh why do I feel this is a disaster waiting to happen ? Michael Kitchen isn't that desperate for work , is he ?—
The Secretary Bird (@Secretary_Byrd) April 24, 2017
I remember wondering when I read The Velvet Onion interview with Rhys Thomas whether he had Michael Kitchen in mind:
Speaking of funny stuff, what’s next for you post-Pern?
A comedy drama called Trailer Park which has been around for ages, but is finally happening. I am going to write that, for the makers of [BBC One drama] The A Word. The plan is to get some of the Pern cast in that, but in new roles.
From an interview with Margaret Atwood in the Calgary Herald:
Asked if she binge-watches series, Atwood said she does, but with boxed DVD sets.
“What we just finished was an English series called ‘Foyle’s War,’ set in (the Second World War). It’s very good,” she said.
She added with her signature wry wit: “People of our generation like it because we recognize all the outfits. We were there.”
“Foyle’s War” is a far cry from “The Handmaid’s Tale“, but each in its way is scarily relevant today at a time when the dark undercurrents of society are coming to the fore.Continue reading
Celebrating this Earth Day and the March for Science with Faraday’s Dream (YouTube link via the FWAS), a short drama documentary in which a dreamy Michael Kitchen portrays the brilliant English scientist, Michael Faraday. Released in 1991 in honor of the 200th anniversary of Faraday’s birth (also the year his image was placed on the £20 note that remained in circulation until 2001), the film won the top four awards at the International Science Film Festival.
Were he alive today, the civic-minded Faraday would no doubt be appalled by the Trump administration’s reliance on “alternative facts” and its concerted attack on science and the environment. Alan Hirshfeld, the author of The Electric Life of Michael Faraday, writes in the book’s preface that Faraday was a powerful advocate for “science education and environmental responsibilty,” using his prestige to denounce “the public’s propensity toward superstition and pseudoscience” and to campaign for urban pollution mitigation.
In showcasing the great Victorian scientist’s charisma, good humor, and relentless enthusiasm for scientific exploration and education, Michael Kitchen makes the perfect on-screen Faraday.Continue reading
Faraday and his wife sadly could not have children of their own, but unlike the fictional childless marriages depicted in several of Michael Kitchen’s other films, the Faradays remained devoted to each other and made the best of their situation by often hosting their nieces and nephews. What fun to see Michael Kitchen playing a man with such an affinity for kids.
Sarah Faraday was played by Ann Penfold, who was Anne opposite MK’s Branwell. Same time period depicted, but thank goodness the long, bushy sideburns fashionable then were toned down for Michael Kitchen’s Faraday.Continue reading
Faraday’s nieces were lucky to live with an uncle who
And later he unveils to them his groundbreaking electric motor based on electromagnetic rotation:
The open dish of mercury, though. Yikes. Faraday’s regular exposure to mercury while conducting experiments could be why he suffered from headaches and memory loss later in life.Continue reading
Remember the glass rod and the feather? A magnet is much heavier than a feather, isn’t it?Continue reading
Faraday understandably rushes to publish his exciting findings on electromagnetic rotation, with the unfortunate result of ruffling the feathers of some of his colleagues, including his mentor Humphry Davy.
Ten years later in 1831, Faraday achieves another momentous breakthrough, the discovery of magnetic induction.Continue reading
One doesn’t usually think of scientists as devout Christians, but Faraday certainly fell into the category as does the evangelical climate scientist, Katharine Hayhoe, whom I came across in this New Yorker podcast. At the end of the compelling piece when asked how successful she’s been in converting evangelicals skeptical of climate change, Hayhoe responds that “for every one letter or comment or email I get saying, ‘Well, you’re not a real scientist because you’re a Christian,’ I get about a hundred saying, ‘Well, you’re not a real Christian because you’re a scientist.'” I’d like to see them try telling Michael Faraday that science and religion are mutually exclusive. Such abhorrent close-mindedness and antagonism toward scientists make the promotion and popularization of science all the more important.Continue reading